White, Allison; "The Times Standard"; 3/2/10; local news; A3
How and where people ask for money in Arcata is up in the air again Wednesday as the Arcata city council takes a look at the new and revised panhandling ordinance. The gist of the ordinance is the same - to prohibit panhandling aggressively and in some areas of the city. The first proposed bill was in October but the council wanted clarification on some topics. Aggressively panhandling is defined in the ordinance as following or touching someone intentionally, using profane or aggressive language, or blocking traffic while asking for goods or money. The ordinance would also restrict where people could panhandle such as a pedestrian bridge and within 20 feet of a supermarket, intersection, ATM, parking lot, restaurant, bus shelter, retail store, or cash checking business. People who appose the ordinance make the argument that it restricts the right to freedom of speech established in the constitution. "Is there a fundamental difference between asking the time of day and asking for a dollar?" asks councilman Shane Brinton.
I don't think that the ordinance is necessary. In my limited experience, I have not seen or experienced aggressive panhandling. I have seen panhandling at intersections but it hasn't seemed to make traffic problems. If the business doesn't want to have panhandlers outside, the employees just have to ask and the panhandlers will most likely go away. I have seen this before. I actually think that panhandling outside of a store gives the panhandler an advantage because you trust them more that they will actually go and get food. If you really want to, you can watch them go into the restaurant and come out with food. Also, It seems like if you can't panhandle within 20 feet of all those businesses, there wouldn't be many places available to panhandle in. Only residential areas and I wouldn't want my neighborhood full of panhandlers.
2.) Have you ever seen or been aggressively panhandled?